James Bond Producers Defend Quantum of Solace


James Bond Producers Defend Defamation of Series Entry Quantum of Solace. The direct sequel to 2006 Royal Casino found 007 of Daniel Craig seeking revenge after the death of his lover Vesper Lynd.

Unfortunately while Royal Casino was almost universally praised, Quantum of Solace found itself being abused by critics and Bond fans alike, and is now the consensus pick for the worst Bond movie of the Craig era. In fact, Craig himself recently spoke about the disappointing Royal Casino follow-up, calling the process to convert it to “s – tshow. Fortunately, the Bond series would bounce back to the critically acclaimed box office success. Skyfall, followed by the financially successful Spectrum.

Quantum of Solace It may be something of a black sheep among Craig-era James Bond movies, but not everyone is lining up to criticize the movie. In fact, Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson spoke up recently to defend the work, explaining to /Film why they think the film is important in the development of the Craig’s Bond performance. Broccoli said:

“I’m very proud of the movie. I think it’s part of the whole evolution of Bond. And I think after ‘Casino Royale’, when he goes down emotionally, the next step was to go out looking for revenge. I think the story of that The movie is that revenge is an empty challenge. You don’t get any benefit from revenge. So I think it’s important in the whole story of this character’s evolution. I’m very proud of it, sure. “

Unfortunately for broccoli, the intended meaning of Quantum of Solace It may have been lost in the middle of the so-called “s – tshow” that the movie eventually became. A catalog of exactly what went wrong in the Royal Casino The follow-up, of course, begins with the unfortunate fact that the film was presented to the cameras without a polished script due to the writers’ strike that was taking place at the time. Fans have also pointed to the film’s revenge angle as a problem, even though Wilson and Broccoli apparently thought the revenge plot was actually a good idea. Another issue that comes up in discussions about Quantum of Solace is that Mathieu Amalric’s villain is weak compared to other Bond baddies. It can also be argued that Marc Forster was a poor choice to direct the film, especially after Martin Campbell did such a solid job on Royal Casino.

It is also interesting that after Quantum of Solace The Bond franchise underwent several adjustments, including the arrival of Sam Mendes to direct Skyfall, and in Spectrum introducing a modified version of the classic Bond villain, Blofeld. So it’s clear that while Broccoli and Wilson personally liked the direction things were taken Quantum of SolaceThey also recognized the need to change course in later films. Which shows that Bond franchise managers are very wise when it comes to reading audience reaction and making any necessary changes. And thanks to these adjustments, the Bond series was able to build the grand climax promised in the next release. No time to die. Then Quantum of Solace It may be a black sheep among Bond films, but its failure at least taught the producers some valuable lessons that they were able to use later, making the Bond series better overall.




techncruncher.blogspot.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *